Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jen Abrahams's avatar

We need civil service reform to staff Mamdani's affordability agenda. This is a really comprehensive call to action on how to make that happen.

Expand full comment
Gabriel Pincus's avatar

Thanks for writing this, I couldn't agree more that it needs reform. The system is so antiquated that it blocks, rather than advances, its original goal of meritocratic hiring. Unqualified people with existing civil service titles are selected for ill-fitting jobs, since the titles rarely reflect the actual needs of the job and are so hard to change. It reduces competition, not the other way around. And because hiring is so difficult, it is often easier to contract out to consultants, costing the city more and depriving it of internal capacity. (Can't believe I said government procurement is "easier" than anything, but compared to hiring I think it is!) One thing you didn't mention is that the civil service exams themselves are not truly exams, at least not the ones I've seen. They are basically HR screening/eligibility forms, e.g. how many years of experience do you have in XYZ? For the ones I saw, I didn't understand why the exam couldn't be 1) permanently open and 2) automatically (and instantly) assessed. This would turn the civil service exam process into something closer to a more modern, standard HR pre-screening.

Expand full comment
7 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?